Engineer-Authored Skills Assessment Reports for Australia and New Zealand
Five focused services covering every skills assessment pathway for engineers and ICT professionals migrating to Australia or New Zealand. CDR writing for Engineers Australia. KA02 for Engineering New Zealand. ACS RPL for ICT professionals. Pre-submission review and post-rejection recovery for those already in motion. All work performed by senior engineers from a single Strathfield NSW office.
Which Service Do You Need?
Pick the row that fits.
If your situation doesn’t match any row, the consultation identifies it. Some applicants don’t need any of these services. Engineers from Washington Accord–accredited programs often qualify for streamlined recognition pathways. We tell you when that applies.
Five Services at a Glance
Quick reference, confirms the routing decision before you click through.
| Service | Who It’s For | Submitted To | Components | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDR Writing | Engineers without Accord recognition | Engineers Australia | 3 Career Episodes + Summary Statement + CPD | 5–21 days |
| CDR Review | Engineers who self-wrote a CDR | EA (after revisions) | Compliance audit + tracked-change file + findings | 5 days |
| Plagiarism Removal | Engineers facing rejection or risk | EA (resubmission) | Recovery scope + rewritten CDR + originality evidence | 5–21 days |
| KA02 Writing | Engineers applying to New Zealand | Engineering NZ | 3–4 Work Samples + Knowledge Profile + CPD | 5–21 days |
| ACS RPL Writing | ICT professionals without ICT qualification | Australian Computer Society | 2 Project Reports + Key Areas of Knowledge | 5–21 days |
Pricing is uniform across all five services, see below.
Uniform Pricing Across All Five Services
The same four-tier package applies across writing, review, plagiarism removal, KA02, and ACS RPL. Tiers differ only on turnaround speed and the seniority of the engineer review built in.
Essential
- Standard turnaround
- Discipline-matched writer
- Plagiarism verification
- Unlimited revisions
Enhanced
- Everything in Essential
- Senior engineer review
- AI-content detection
- Faster turnaround
Premium
- Everything in Enhanced
- Two compliance reviews
- Priority queue placement
- WhatsApp direct line
Supreme
- Everything in Premium
- 5-day delivery
- Senior engineer lead
- Same-day consultation
Engineers Australia’s assessment fee is paid directly to EA, currently around AUD 907.50. Payment terms: 50% deposit on engagement, 50% on draft delivery. We accept Visa, Mastercard, bank transfer, and PayPal.
The Five Services
Each service has its own dedicated page with full process and FAQs. The summaries below give you the core picture.
CDR Report Writing
Full Competency Demonstration Report drafting for engineers applying to Engineers Australia.
A CDR contains three Career Episodes (1,000–2,500 words each) describing engineering activities you have personally performed, a Summary Statement that maps competency elements to specific paragraphs, and a Continuing Professional Development record. Our engagement covers project shortlisting, discipline-matched writer assignment, full drafting, Summary Statement cross-referencing, plagiarism scanning, and final compliance review.
CDR Report Review
A senior engineer reads your self-written CDR and identifies issues before Engineers Australia sees the document.
The review checks eleven dimensions: MSA Booklet 2026 structural compliance, Career Episode word counts, first-person voice, Summary Statement cross-referencing, ANZSCO duty alignment, project distinctness, CPD format, plagiarism similarity, AI-content patterns, English language quality, and Personal Engineering Activity proportion. Reviews concluding “submit as written” happen in around one in eight engagements. We say it directly.
CDR Plagiarism Removal & Rewriting
For engineers whose CDR has been flagged for plagiarism, paraphrasing-tool output, or AI-generated content.
Engineers Australia’s 2026 detection routines flag content from three sources: an internal database of every CDR ever assessed, external web and academic-database scanning, and statistical detection of AI-generated text patterns. Paraphrasing the rejected document doesn’t fix any of these flags. The only path that holds up under current assessment is rewriting from your project source material, by an engineer who hasn’t used the original flagged text as a reference.
KA02 Report Writing
Knowledge Assessment submissions for Engineering New Zealand (formerly IPENZ).
KA02 is the document required when your engineering qualification isn’t recognised under the Washington Accord and you’re applying for skilled migration to New Zealand or Chartered Professional Engineer status. About 30–40% of applicants who arrive intending to commission KA02 actually qualify for KA01. The streamlined recognition pathway. The consultation includes a free five-minute KA01/KA02 path confirmation before any drafting begins.
ACS RPL Report Writing
Recognition of Prior Learning submissions for the Australian Computer Society.
ACS RPL applies to ICT professionals, software engineers, developers, network specialists, cyber security engineers, data engineers, whose qualification doesn’t satisfy ACS’s degree-content threshold. The submission contains a Key Areas of Knowledge narrative covering the ACS Core Body of Knowledge, plus two Project Reports each describing a project performed within strict recency windows.
What’s Consistent Across Every Service
Five commitments that apply equally to every engagement.
Discipline matching at the writer level
A petroleum CDR is drafted by a petroleum engineer. A software ACS RPL by a writer who has built software professionally. Generalist writers are not assigned to specialist documents.
No AI-generated content for body writing
Every paragraph of every document we deliver is human-authored from your project material. Grammar checking is permitted; AI content generation is not.
Plagiarism & originality verification on every deliverable
Turnitin similarity scanning runs on every CDR, KA02, and ACS RPL. AI-content detection runs as an independent pass where relevant. Verification reports are part of what you receive.
Honest scope at the consultation stage
If your situation doesn’t actually require the service you came to commission, we tell you. This applies to KA02 commissioners who qualify for KA01, RPL commissioners who qualify for ACS Standard, and Review commissioners whose CDR is sound enough to submit as written.
Single Strathfield NSW office, single team
All work is performed by the same team, in the same office, accountable to the same client liaison. Outsourcing to overseas writers isn’t part of how we operate.
Across Every Service
“Combined CDR + KA02 engagement. Same engineering background restructured for both Engineers Australia and Engineering NZ. Both submissions ready four months after starting; awarded outcomes from both bodies.”
“Self-taught Java developer, eleven years of professional work, no degree. ACS RPL with Software Engineer (261313) as the nominated occupation. Suitable outcome on first submission.”
“Recovery engagement after EA rejected my CDR for AI-generated content. The rewrite started over from my project notes, nothing from the AI text was reused. Approved on resubmission.”
Free 15-minute consultation
We’ll route you to the right service, or tell you that you don’t need one at all. Some applicants qualify for streamlined recognition pathways and never need a paid engagement.
Start the conversation on WhatsApp